Ap World History 2010 Q3

WORLD HISTORY 2010 win GUIDELINES Question 3 comparative degree BASIC CORE (competence) 07 Points 1. Has acceptable dissertation. 1 Point The thesis must include some(prenominal) a effectual relation and a reasoned difference in methods of political control in both of the empires. The thesis must be pertinent to the duration period, but the dates need not be explicit. The thesis must be explicitly stated in the introduction or the specified conclusion of the see. The thesis may appear as ane sentence or as multiple sentences. A thesis that is bring out among multiple paragraphs or merely restates the prompt is unacceptable. The thesis CANNOT count for each other focus. 2. Addresses all parts of the scruple, though not necessarily as or thoroughly. 2 Points For 2 crests Identifies at to the lowest degree(prenominal) adept valid similarity and one valid difference in methods of political control. Discusses two empires but not necessarily evenly. For 1 point Identifies at least one valid similarity or at least one valid difference in methods of political control. Discusses two empires but not necessarily evenly. 3. Substantiates thesis with appropriate historical rise. 2 Points For 2 points must(prenominal) provide at least five specific pieces of show (at least two from each empire). Evidence must be in spite of appearance the designated time periods (e. g. , certainty from the Roman Republic or Qin dynasty is not acceptable). For 1 point Must provide at least three specific pieces of evidence (at least one from each empire). Evidence must be inwardly the designated time periods. 4. Makes at least one take, relevant comparison amid/among societies. 1 Point (The direct comparison may discuss either similarities or differences. ) To earn this point, the comparison must be made someplace other than in the thesis. . Analyzes at least one reason for a similarity or a difference identified in a direct comparison. Analysis (rea son why) must be related to a similarity or a difference in methods of political control amid the two empires. Subtotal 1 Point 7 Points 2010 The College placard. inflict the College Board on the weathervane www. collegeboard. com. AP WORLD HISTORY 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 Comparative (continued) EXPANDED CORE (excellence) Expands beyond primary core of 17 points. A student must earn 7 points in the basic core area before earning points in the expanded core area. 02 PointsExamples Has a clear, analytical and comprehensive thesis. Addresses all parts of the question thoroughly (as relevant) comparisons, chronology, causation, connections, themes, interactions, content. Provides ample historical evidence to substantiate thesis. Relates comparisons to larger globular context. Makes several direct, relevant comparisons between or among societies. Consistently analyzes the causes and effects of relevant similarities and differences. Applies relevant knowledge of other regions or world historical processes. Discusses alternate oer time (e. g. changing methods of political control as the empires began to decline). Recognizes nuances within empires. Subtotal 2 Points TOTAL 9 Points 2010 The College Board. run across the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board.Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. ollegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com. AP WORLD HIST ORY 2010 SCORING exposition Question 3 Overview The intent of the question was for students to pick two of the stipulated empires Han chinaware (206 B. C. E. to 220 C. E. ), Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B. C. E. to 550 C. E. ), Imperial Rome (31 B. C. E. to 476 C. E. ) and compare the ways those empires exerted political control over their populaces.Students were explicitly told to discuss both similarities and differences in methods of political control. specimen 3A give 8 The essay contains a valid thesis in the secant and third sentences of the first paragraph (1 point). In the fourth paragraph, the essay addresses a similarity (Both empires had unstable borders) and several differences, including However, Han mainland china dealt with the Turkic Huns by dint of the tribute systems, thus placating them with gifts and avoiding costly & expensive warfare, which Rome preferent when dealing with their enemies (2 points).Although in that respect is ample evidence for the Han, R oman evidence is peculiar(a) by discussion of the Republic, which could not be counted. There is, however, enough evidence for 2 evidence points. In addition to the direct comparison listed above, in that location is another difference at the bottom of the second paragraph However, because there was less emphasis as a collective group in Rome, the political organization was a lot less structured than Chinas which earned 1 point for the comparison and 1 point because the statement also involves an psychoanalysis.This essay contained a complex thesis, sufficient foresight of comparison, and supporting evidence to earn 1 Expanded Core point. judge 3B Score 6 This essay contains a valid thesis in the first paragraph (1 point) and addresses both similarities and differences (2 points). There is sufficient evidence for both the Mauryan/Gupta and the Han empires (2 points). The direct comparison is found in the second paragraph Han China and Maurya Gupta sic both consolidated their power through military buildup (1 point).The essay attempts analysis in the next to the last paragraph but only analyzes the Han due to their lack of a devout religion, China was able to assimilate the Huns when they began to run over China. There is no analysis of a comparison of Han and Mauryan/Gupta methods of political control. Sample 3C Score 3 There is no valid thesis because the essay attempts to show a difference between Han and Rome in wrong of the Roman Republic, which is outside the time period. The essay only addresses similarities, not valid differences (1 point).The evidence is sufficient for the Han, but the only valid piece of evidence for Rome is the statement that He Augustus defeated Cleopatra and Mark Anthony making original that Rome is politically secured (1 point). Most of the Roman evidence is prior to 31 B. C. E. and therefore did not earn credit. The essay has a valid direct comparison in the fourth paragraph The size of both empires was an set off th at led to leaders ultimately losing political control of both empires (1 point). 2010 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web www. collegeboard. com.