The History Of Capital Punishment Criminology Essay

The History Of superior Punishment Criminology Essay end-to-end the ages swell penalisation has been an extremely controversial emerge. Some whitethorn emphasize it is needed in order to serve as an example to opposite criminals, as well as to obtain retri notwithstandingion on behalf of the victims mingled (Henderson). It may be suggested that it helps to bring peace and order into societies however, does 1 genuinely understand the moral injustice that theyre supporting? Capital penalization, also know as the devastation penalisation, is defined as the lawfully authorized violent death of a soul as penalty for a discourtesy (Mifflin). though there ar some citizens passim the world that support this punishment, others guess that punishment should non bewilder to come down to such forceful and cruel measures. The authorized killing of a person is morally harmfulness and using execution as a kind of punishment leaves no room for shifts (Hennigfeld). Ca pital punishment does not diminish the murder or curse pass judgment and encourages both the pickings of a hu populace cosmoss life, as well as juvenile nuisance (Stewart). In legion(predicate) lawsuits, jacket punishment is extremely discriminatory (Szumski). There is a question stuck in unmatcheds mind should working nifty punishment be reinstated? When taking all factors into consideration, the dissolving agent is inevitably no.When hatful hear that a murderer is creation kill for their actions, piece of musicy another(prenominal) will applaud and say good riddance, they got what they merit An eye for an eye (Berns). This is ruthless and morally ill-treat. The death penalization is a cruel and in pityinge form of punishment. It is execution, and is very similar to torture involving the meditate assault of a prisoner (Henningfeld). In m whatsoever aspects of life large number are taught that it is not right to kill, hitherto if the person is a murderer. som e religions share very strong and opened opinions on this topic virtually all are against the death penalisation (Weksesser). The Catholic Church is one of the major religions that oppose the intentional killing of a person, no government issue who it may be. The church aims to abolish the death punishment, stating Abolition sends a centre that we stand break the cycle of violence that we need not gravel a life for a life (Overberg). The Catholic Church, along with many other religions, is pro-life. Other religions like Buddhism strongly emphasize on non-violence and lenience for all life. Buddhists believe in abstaining from killing any living creature, no matter what they strike through or how bad the crime is (Wang). morality is not the whole if area that stresses the wrongfulness of the death penalty- plane the Charter of Rights and Freedoms opposes it. The one-eighth amendment states Excessive bails shall not be required nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted (D uhaime) this rises how the killing of any serviceman worldness is not to be tolerated. Criminals should be fit to change their ways and take responsibility for their actions to a greater extentover, if they are killed the law is present that when you demonstrate a mistake it defines who you are and that you cannot be forgiven (Williams). Capital punishment leads citizens to be so focused on serving justice to criminals for what they deserve that they forget to realize how appalling and immoral it is to take a mankind life.When a person is convicted of a crime, they are punished on the priming that there is no doubt that this is the person who bankted the unlawful act. The impeach can only be convicted if the court is one hundred part certain that this person has affiliated the crime they are accused of, or so it should be that way (Baird). The problem that arises when the death penalty is legal is that there is utterly no room for errors. If the jury happened to make t he wrong decision in the verdict and sentenced an candid person to death, how is that any founder than a cold blooded murder? There have been many cases where the person has been wrongfully convicted to death and narrate arises later proving the state of that persons sinlessness (Dee). In the case of Carlos DeLuna, an innocent man was executed merely because of exact evidence and what one witness thought they saw. In 1983 he was convicted for fatally stabbing and killing a cleaning lady in a position the great unwashed and without much direct evidence he was put to death in 1989 (Dee). Later, reporters discovered that DeLuna was in fact innocent and a man named Carlos Hernandez was the real criminal. This was the fourth documented investigation of the execution of an innocent man in Texas (Dee). This notion is also evident in the case of Steven Truscott a 14 year old boy was sentenced to death after a very short and circumstantial case. Police dismissed all evidence that made Steven Truscott innocent and focused all their power on how to make him look guilty. The death penalty was abolished and Steven was not executed, merely he exhausted more than half of his life in jail, only to have his case reopened and show that he was completely innocent (Hendley). If the death penalty hadnt been abolished in time a poor innocent boy would have been dispatch for the errors of the courts judgement. Capital punishment has way too many errors to be an hard-hitting way of insuring that the victims get revenge on their criminals. Illinois has halted executions after finding that 52 percent of their death row inmates were innocent (Spagnoli). This is more than half of the inmates that are sentenced to death All these factors show the extreme errors that the courts have made pertaining to capital punishment cases, causing innocent people to be brutally kill for crimes they did not commit.A countless number of people believe that capital punishment is an efficient way to frighten criminals and lower crime evaluate throughout the world. star might think that it was that simple, but in pragmatism that is not how it works. Statistics prove that having capital punishment does not deter crime at all in actuality studies have shown that it seems to increase crime rate (Espejo). Studies in the United States of the States show that states which support the death penalty have a high crime rate than in states without it. In 2008 the crime rate in states with the death penalty was 5.72 (per 100,000 people) and states without the death penalty was 4.05(per 100,000 people) a 41 percent contravention (Dieter). In 2009 a reflect was conducted and showed that states with the death penalty had a crime rate of 5.26 (per 100,000 people), whereas the states without the death penalty had a crime rate of 3.90 (per 100,000 people) a 35 percent difference (Dieter). Could this be a two year fluke? non likely, since statistics show that in 2010 the crime rates for states with the death penalty was 5.00 and without the death penalty were 4.01 a 25 percent difference (Dieter). The crime rate in states without capital punishment is significantly lower than those states that have capital punishment. In Canada capital punishment is illegal, whereas in the United States of America some states palliate, to this day, supply it (Henderson). Studies show that the United States of Americas crime rate was four times higher than Canadas, causing them to rank first in crime rates throughout the world (Spagnoli). These statistics show that regardless of the death penalty, criminals are not culture their lesson with such violent tortures. Therefore, the death penalty is neither a qualified nor effective deterrent.Laws are put into place to encourage youths not to commit crimes and show citizens that committing a crime is wrong. Capital punishment is therefore counterproductive in promoting the taking of peoples lives and encouraging juvenile violence . Since capital punishment is not preventing crime, there is now the issue that it is encouraging taking a human beings life (Winters). Everyone is taught not to kill, and that taking a persons life is an immoral offence to commit, therefore how can people turn around and say that murdering a prisoner is right? Murder is wrong, no matter the aftermath, sexuality, background, or typesetters case of the offender. Committing the act of murder is still wrong and capital punishment promotes, even encourages, that taking someones life is fine on certain grounds (Williams). Capital punishment promotes vengeance, even if the family of the victims, or anyone who is heavily connected to the case, is not instantaneously killing the accused. The law is showing that people can obtain vengeance legally by watching a person being executed (Hennigfeld). Many argue that there is a deterrent effect and so it does not encourage crime but stops it this is inevitably false. rase if there is a deter rent effect, it is overshadowed by the destructive effects of animalisation (Winters) No matter if there is the slimmest percent that crime is being prevented, it is being made up for, by brutally killing a human being for a mistake that they have made (Williams). People track down to hide behind the deterrence theory and use it as an rationalise to the real reasons behind why they want a person to be put to death. Not justice and retribution, but rage and revenge (Baird). Not only does capital punishment encourage taking a persons life, but it promotes juvenile violence. Younger siblings look up to their older siblings, parents, the media, or even stories told around them and to live by the example that is set for them (Wekesser). By allowing capital punishment to be legal, the law is setting an example to youths that killing and any act of violence is acceptable in this day and age. A call for done compared the United States of Americas juvenile crime rates to Canadas the Unit ed States being a country that allows the death penalty in some states and Canada being a country that does not allow it at all (Spagnoli). In the United States the juvenile crime rate was 2.0 (per 100,000 people) in 2008, and in Canada the crime rate was only 1.0 (per 100,000 people) (Spagnoli). Comparing states with the death penalty and states without it, studies show that in 2008 states without the death penalty, had only minimal youth crimes while states with the death penalty, had a higher number of youth crimes (Spagnoli). For example, in Minnesota there were only 208 youth crimes, whereas Illinois has 1066 youth crimes (Spagnoli). Though some citizens believe that capital punishment deters crime and shows youths what not to do, in actuality it encourages the taking of a persons life and causes youths to exist the example given to them by the country they live in.The law states that both single human being- no matter what race, gender, or economic status- is authorise to a fair trial. All courts have to abide by this rule, but many tend to forget this important point (Allen). Discrimination is an issue that arises when discussing capital punishment. The death penalty is economically discriminatory, since in order to have a fair trail there has to be some form of equality among the plaintiff and the defendant (Allen). The upper class has a colossal advantage because just about courts see the upper class citizens as the better, more honorable people in society, due to their income. The lower class may not have the money to afford a lawyer and may be given a lawyer (called a pro bono lawyer) from the court. In most of cases these lawyers are not as experienced or as dedicated to the case as the prosecutors are (Szumski). The economic bias that is created can cause unfair judgement and wrongful conviction that can potentially end the life of an innocent person. The death penalty does not only discriminate against a persons economic status but it also d oes not work in favour of a persons race. In the United States of America there is a serve problem when it comes to capital punishment and racial discrimination (Demuth). African American citizens make up only 12 or 13% of the population, but they represent 34% of executions (Spagnoli). Is there a stigma towards the African American citizens? The evidence shows that yes, there is. The death penalty does not only look at the race of the accused but also the race of the victims. When a Caucasian person is murdered the probability of a person getting the death penalty is a lot greater (Spagnoli). A study was done in 2009 that showed 77% of executions were done on criminals that were accused of having a Caucasian victim (Spagnoli). When a person commits a crime it should not matter what race they are, or what race their victims are they should be treated fairly and justly in a court of law. Therefore, capital punishment fails to demonstrate the equality that is needed to entertain peo ples lives. Capital punishment has a number of discriminatory flaws including discrimination against the gender of the accused. It has been proven in a study, done by Elizabeth Rapaport, that many women who are convicted of murder do not get sentenced to be executed (Rapaport). One percent of men convicted of murder are sentenced to death, while only one tenth of one percent of women convicted of murders are sentenced to death (Rapaport). Her research distinctly shows the endless discrimination that the courts have towards the male gender and that the death penalty is strongly biased. A study shows that there has only been one woman out of 143 people who were executed since 1977 in the United States of America (Dicks). even though the legal system says that everyone is entitled to a fair, just trial, capital punishment brings out discrimination in many forms and tragically sentences innocent people to execution.In conclusion, the debate about capital punishment has been sacking on for years. It is a very controversial and talked about issue, but in truth, the death penalty is wrong and should not be reinstated. Capital punishment is morally wrong it goes against almost every religion and their teachings. It also denies people very important freedoms that they have a right to. One of the most pressing issues with capital punishment is that there is no room for error many innocent people have had their lives taken away because of flaws within the legal system. It does not diminish the crime rate, and in most cases the states that still allow capital punishment have a higher crime rate than those without it. Capital punishment does not only promote taking someones life but it encourages youths to commit violent acts. It shows how hypocritical citizens can be by telling people that the act of killing is morally wrong yet then doing the same act to a human who has committed a crime. Not to mention, juvenile crime rates are a lot higher in states with the death p enalty than states without it. The death penalty also discriminates based on gender, race, and economical class allowing certain races, genders and classes to have more privileges than others. Many people may feel that capital punishment is the right thing to do and that it helps keep order in our world. However, in reality capital punishment makes murderers of us all.